A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
Hogwash!!! The inspector can safely inspect the rental unit as a stand alone. What if it was simply a townhouse? Is the city going to inspect ALL of the connected private homes? No legal reason what so ever to enter the adjacent private home. Period!!!
But WE have to make sure you are safe! Same excuse as the seat belt laws.
Not unless there is a damn good reason!!!!!!
Now people might understand the second amendment
Remember the Nazis searching for jews!!?? This is what nwo is
Bear arms
This is the America you want to live in? Vote Trump!
They better have guns and cops
No way
The constitution is slowly being chipped away. One day it will hang on by a thread and it will be too late for us all