A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
Not on my watch
Sure. Lets start by inspecting my gun cabinet, shall we. Step right this way Mr. City official…
Come knocking again and your going to be looking down the barrel of a 12 gauge amen I open that door.
welcome to the NWO,
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help.
It’s Minnesota what do you expect?
Waco, Minnesota, St. Louis.
Shoot ’em coming thru the door
The story implies that the city is the landlord. If that’s the case, as with just about any lease or rental agreement, if not specifically stated otherwise, the landlord has the right to inspect the property from time to time.
That’s what goes on in these crazy states like this…………not to mention their idea of raising kids……………..until folks get the power back from these crazies in politics expect things to get even worse…………until then, MOVE ASAP……………
WHY