A major decision that will impact Minnesotans’ privacy rights is waiting to be heard in the state’s court of Appeals.
It all started off simply enough. Jason and Jackie Wiebesick were a Golden Valley couple who lived in a duplex. One day, officials from the city approached them to ask permission to inspect their home. The stated reason was to collect information so as to make a decision over whether to renew the Wiebesick’s rental license.
Disturbed by the prospect of unfamiliar people walking around their home, the Wiebesick’s turned down the inspectors’ request. One might think it would have ended there, but the city saw to it that it didn’t.
Taking the case to court, Golden Valley authorities implored a county judge to issue a warrant overriding the Wiebesick’s objections and allowing them into the house. Tellingly, the judge refused their request for a warrant, prompting the city to reach even higher.
See video about the case on the next page:
No right
enter my home and DIE .
Well I demand that government get the hell out of my life. Unfortunate that 1775 has to repeat itself.
PERHAPS CHRISTIANS THE REAL REASON?
TRRUUUMMMPP NOW!
Ummm, NO.
Would get lead poisoning at my house!
That is unlawful,read the constitution,no one has a right to enter your home unless they have a warrant showing probable cause,and it had better be a good one. It is time for people to stand up for what is right. Vote Trump,lets get America back on the road and get her moving in the right direction.
We get the government we elect. Keep electing socialists and this is what you get.
the right are the ones instituting a change toward a police state. Their is this thing called history, you should read up on it.
That state getting out of hand with people’s right