“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
This is full of BS…. you all claim he has committed crimes… if that the case why hasn’t this guy arrested him oh that right cause he hasn’t… just like republicans in congress say they can impeach him but yet haven’t.. you want to know why they don’t have a actual real reason to do it…. this is n’
ALL people involved and knowing what has been done and they have the AUTHORITY to do something about it and don’t, should be charged as well. Do something now.
Kay, Rebups didn’t give us the economy busting, socialism inspired obamacare or release terrorists to get traitor back! Repubs didn’t raise the debt trillions of dollars! Repubs aren’t taking monthly vacations to Hawaii on our dime! Repubs aren’t bypassing congress unconstitutionally to pass laws taking away your rights! Ovomit and his lib nazis are!
Why didn’t the Sargeant of Arms not arrest George Bush Jr. For crimes against humanity?
It doesn’t matter this guy is just another pawn he won’t do anything but take a duffel bag of tax payer cash home with him.
Nothing is going to happen. Why? Because they are all bought and payed for.
The problem is, he is just the tip of the iceberg, a mouth piece for the masterminds.
Fire him.
He won’t do it if he is a anti- Aerican muslim sympathizer.
Throw the key away after u do an worry only about us like the rest of the world does their country