“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
then arrest the sergeant at arms
can i sell u a bridge?
Sheila Reynolds,are you living in a cave?
arrest his sorry ass, he has committed all kinds of crimes. we could not get by with the $#%&!@* he has done
OH HOW I PRAY FOR THIS
if he want find someone that will
Today please
What you are trying to do , Jones, is the very reason we have secret ballots…… So no, you cannot legally “Find out” who voted for him…
The responsibility would directly to the person right below the Sgt at arms to remove the SAA and arrest him then arrest Obama.
The “president” has done nothing wrong , says those who take from the makers every month and call us racists if we try to educate America to the race-baiting Muslim-in-charge who is $#%&!@*ting on our veterans and real Americans. We haven’t even started on his constitutional failures.