“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Just an FYI as a former solder gov pay us and we follow the president calls so asking the SGT at arms is worthless
FYI any illegal order does NOT have to be followed
Get a new SgtinArms & arrest them both!!!
All of this discussion will be moot unless the House begins to implement articles of impeachment
i want to know how much is obama paying him to look the other way
Aaaaahhhaaaaa! I still love and support my president!
Classic merrie
the courts are becoming just as asinine as the president and senate to boot….they are ALL JUST AS GUILTY!!! AND ALL NEED TO BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY!!! to leave ONE IN PLACE WILL NOT CUT THE HEAD OFF THE SERPENT!!!
Put him in cuffs
i think we need a new sgt at arms
he’s stocking up on ammo and body bags.he knows you can only push so far.and the people are tired of his $#%&!@* and really the government. and they know something is going to happen real soon. impeach his worthless ass.but then you have joe biden? can you impeach the whole government? thats what needs to be done.we need people thats struggled to feed their family, and really worked in their lives to be president.not some silver spoon M.F.E.R.!