“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Don’t I wish!!
Arrest & prosecute for TREASON. ASAP
he lied the oath and is void as pres
Sure needs yo be
Sure….. how many times have we heard this
So why didn’t they arrest Bush when unilaterally when to war without congressional approval oh yes my friends that’s exactly what Bush did and that’s why his missing 22 million emails are so important also because he put this country into one of the biggest recessions ever and all of you keep hating on Obama but he has pulled this country out of said recession and I think most of you just don’t like a Black man in the white house or a woman but to bad!!
If this picture was only true.
That be A dream come true.
I agree
Should be arrested and put away for good