“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
LOCK HIM. UP WITH HILLARY
Now I’d love to see this POS go down for the danger he’s caused Americans, and take them fucking Clinton’s with you too….
Honor is not even in the equation for Obumber. He would have to Google the word first.
Little does the spineless little man know but if had half a brain if he’d arrest the muslim pos he would be a frickin’ hero!!!!
Could we honestly get that lucky?
Yes the sergeant at arms is guilty of deriliction of duty,and abandoning his post.
The military has the right and responsibility to arrest ANYONE that has committed treason and the penalty is death in time of war they are obligated to do so also the corrupt FBI by law has the obligations to arrest ANYONE for violating the CONSTITUTION NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW
He needs to stripped of all power, money and his retirement and send to Prison!
So this man is bought by Clinton too? He’s no better then FBI and DOJ
Yea,Like anything will ever happen..There are no honest ,real men left to take care of him…