“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
I only wish
Yes
Where’s this been the last ALMOST 8 YRS???
hell yes
Wish I could put the cuffs on
DO IT!!!!!!
It’s been a long time since I learned this but I know it was when I was in elementary I believe it goes next to Four Star General
Yeah I wish the meadia was telling the truth a bout this. But to many are full of c**p
I know there’s a set of rules I learned them when I was a kid you mean our politicians you guys don’t know this stuff somebody needs to get in the archives and start reading
Who is responsible ?
Where does the rubber meets the road?
Where does the buck stop?
Ask Trey Gowdy?