“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Cause it’s all Democrat’s fault. Wow they are getting bummer.
Okay. Wow. Both need to go
Be still my heart, I hope this will be true. We should have known That B O does Not stand for just Barack Obama, but stink.
Like so many times, I’ll believe it when I see it.
He and Clinton have both done treasonest things….used to be corporal punishment for treason!
Scott Vacha well they weren’t bought out by the Clintons and there corruption. Watch the news dude
What lies. We’re do u all get this from.
ARREST HIM BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE!!!
Well where is the sergeant at arms? Why has this position just sit there?
F*ck off DEPLORABLES !!1