“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Dream on!
Yea whatever. They won’t even arrest Hillary. Lol it’s the whole system. Everyone of them is corrupt.
The military can arrest Obama if someone can put out a warrant
None of congress is going to act unless pushed to do something. They are either afraid of losing their positions, in league with obama , or afraid of consequences if they fail. It is also apparently an unresolved constitutional question (arrest of a sitting president) to protect the independence of the three branches. I suspect he has to be removed from office by impeachment first before criminal action can be taken. When it starts to actually cost our congressmen not to act – then we will see results.
Don’t talk about it, DO IT.
I’m so sick of this c**p you don’t intend to arrest him so give it up.
Needle hell, get the rope with a short drop so you can see them dance.
LETS DO IT.
The one that brought down the United States when George W bush or jr. Like I’d like to call him remember he was the president when the World Trade Center came down
Please please America make people above the poverty line to pay for their wrong doing especially towards AMERICA.