“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
Hey it’s mot just Obama or Hilary your senate is busy rewriting the Constitution to give Obama more power than any president in history to declare martial law any where in the world and he’s a Muslim you have been sold out to the Muslim world
What the$#%&!@*is trinckle down?
How did Mr. Will is on get his position to start with? It isn’t chosen by the general public. I suspect it is the Senate’s position to replace him. If they don’t act it may be up to the next president to resolve this issue.
You don’t believe in spelling, either do you?
Why don’t you try reading it, idiot
please make that happen quickly, otherwise he will give everyone more of his majic kool aid.
Fascism. Just say it. Or do you even know what it means?
Bash his head with a bat
Don’t forget killary the socialism queen
Arrest yesterday Gitmo tomorrow