“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
I still won’t be happy till I see Obama being dragged Kicking and Screaming from the Oval Office. Enough treasonous b******* America. Drag his$#%&!@*off to prison along with Hillary.
If the Sergeant in Arms won’t do it, let’s get our military and National Guard to do it.
Lock them both up !!! Next person under Mr Willison or the highest rank in Military should have the authority and right to complete task at hand
traitor
DO, DO IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lmao
I stop believing in that$#%&!@*along time ago seems everybody wants him arrested tried there’s that nothing seems to happen to him far as I’m concerned it’s all BS now
ARREST OBAMA AND CLINTON – Put them in a cell together and they can lie to each other and blame it all on Trump
Finally someone is bringing up the subject of treason.
The sergeant at arms who is Andrew. B. Willison is the man who can arrest Obama and he won’t do it. this sounds like some one has paid him off. Nothing new in politics. I think all of em in Washington are either bought off or have been blackmailed every one in DC is corrupt.