“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
As long as Obama has the support of the Senate, he isn’t going to be arrested or impeached. I’m not sure what authority any military officials have over him regarding the charges of “treason” that are being cited against him. It would help a lot if the major media began to report his “crimes” rather than his excuses and “spins”.
you republicans suck to much $#%&!@* pull Rush’s and Shawn’s dicks out of your mouths …Of course getting that BUSH & CHENEY dicks out of your asses was hard I know ,,Obama is a better man than any of you will ever be …
Gee Robert Thurman…your brain and dick seem to be the same size…tiny! Check for the dicks up your ass before talking. You probably like it.
Wish it would just happen already!
I, too, have wondered who could and would arrest Obama. I learned that the Sergeant at Arms could do this.
Barack Obama is the anti Christ….he has single handed changed the whole world…he is a puppet with only one master…..he is that dude forspoke of in revelation…if any of you think this is political then you all haven’t been reading you bibles….ijs
Paula and Ronnie, part of the kool aid drinking Obama supporting idiots that think he is above the law or just too uniformed lemmings!
Somebody needs to fire the sergeant-at- arms and hire someone that will do his job
Coward of the couunty
I would say the person that appointed the Sergeant at Arms should have authority over his actions or non-actions. This person should be able to remove the Sergeant at Arms and appoint a new one the will do his duties.
You people need help, get it soon.