“The Sergeant at Arms is authorized to arrest and detain any person violating Senate rules, including the President of the United States,” states the senate.gov website.
The Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate, currently Andrew B. Willison, is the only person with authority to arrest a sitting president – if the president has violated Senate rules – which Obama certainly has.
But what if the Sergeant at Arms won’t do his job and arrest the President when crimes have been committed?
If Andrew Willison will not perform his duty and arrest the president for crimes Obama has committed, is Mr. Willison not complicit and guilty of a criminal act himself?
CONTINUE ON PAGE 2:
This would make headlines by the media maybe. If they are the leftist it won’t be mention.
Agree with John C Heckemeyer
I await the day.
Quit teasing us
I’m with you Joe
I wish there was someone in Our Government besides Obama with some balls. Obama does what ever he wants & no one stops him. Tell me again why we have a government? Oh that’s right; for them to get richer & us to get poorer!
Arrest the p f now. No other criminal would they wait for them to say good bye to the family
Cut the bull$#%&!@*it will never happen unless we have a military coo and I don’t think they have the balls any more other wise they would have done it allready
The day is coming, maybe Hillary we share her cell with him.
Ok. I’ll play along: what ‘senate rules’ is the President supposed to have broken? I’ll wait…