Explosive: Obama’s DHS May Have Planted Evidence of Russian Interference

A new theory has arisen concerning the whole Russia Cyber Hack of the U.S. Elections and its aim is to sow doubt in a populace that has already become wary of the reliability of the internet and computer software.  The newest story alleges that the federal government was aware of massive breaches in security even before the election last year and that up to 39 states' election systems may have been breached.

One thing you have to give to the Left and that is their wonderfully nuanced way of packaging any news story, celebrity, product, or theory.  In the first place, we all know how the “fake news” mills have been churning out Leftist propaganda for close to 7 decades.  We can point to hundreds of instances where celebrities have been able to insinuate themselves into the political conversation in a lame attempt to steer the national conversations.  As for products, there is a whole host of things that the Left appears to package well, even when the product inside is a detestable monster.

The newest theory has now arrived and has become the current rave for all Leftists; one that very well may eclipse the Global Warming zeal that has plagued mankind for nearly 40 years.  And, it has to do with the great assault on our President.  It is an institutional lie that was created out of thin air way back in the opening days of 2016.

Welcome to the newest addition to the Lexicon of the Left:  Russia-Cyber Hacks!

When reading or hearing about Russia-Cyber Hacks (or any other pet Progressive ideology) always apply a simple method of knowing whether or not it's true.  If it is in the news every other day…lie.  If it's referenced in loose, whistling-past-the-graveyard terms, or merely “innocently overlooked” by the media…truth.  Very simple.  Apply these standards to every single Leftist story and you'll instantly know the truth in any situation.  NOTE:  This also applies to RINO-supported news of the day as well.

Now that we've established the rules, let's put the Russia-Cyber Hack story to the test.

Is it in the news every other day?  Exactly.  So, in case you're already bored with this narrative and are thinking, when are the friggin Liberals gonna shut up about this whole thing, the answer is “never.”  This is exactly how they create the illusion of truth.  Just like the Nazis and their fun little motto about repeating a big enough lie, often enough, until it becomes the truth.  This is their modus operandi in a nutshell.

The Russia-Cyber Hacks story has suddenly reached a new level of ridiculousness.  BloombergPolitics has written a piece on this newest story of 39 States' election systems having been “breached” by the Russians! Here we go:

Russia’s cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump’s election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost twice as many states as previously reported.

I want to take you back to December of 2016 when a very brief scandal had erupted for about three seconds involving hacking of elections systems. But it was not a story about the Russians. Rather, it was a story about the Department of Homeland Security hacking into Georgia's elections systems! Let's go into a brief truncated version of the events:

1. The Obama administration issues an order through the Department of Homeland Security which designates all local and state election machinery as part of federal “critical infrastructure” (TRANSLATION:  Feds have complete control over election systems in every State!)
2. Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp announces that he is in direct opposition of this “designation.”
3. Following his declaration, several “scans” of Georgia's election network are blocked by its Firewall program.
4. Directly leading up to November's election, there is a marked “uptick” in these scans.
5. In a temper tantrum, Obama pushes DHS Director Jeh Johnson to unilaterally make the “designation” official.
6. Multiple State-level Secretaries of State (Right & Left) protest the move.
7. More “scans” occur in the Georgia elections systems and are blocked.
8. Kemp tracks the “scans” to be originating from an IP address that matches the DHS!
9. Kemp contacts Johnson about these “scans” and the Director lies, stating that no tests took place.
10. The last effort to penetrate the Georgia elections system (which Kemp called a large attack) happened on November 15th, a week AFTER the election took place, but BEFORE the State had certified its results!

In order to understand the above-referenced story, you must also be made aware of what a scan is. Scans are attacks to test security weaknesses in a computer network or program. The Daily Caller described it this way: “It's called the electronic equivalent of ‘rattling doorknobs' to see if they're unlocked – or on a darker side, to send a message to a recipient.”

The point here is that Georgia's Secretary of State was against the Obama administration taking over all the elections systems in the state. As well, other Secretaries of State were also upset about this. It's a safe bet to assume that these “scans” by the DHS were purposeful and were a veiled message.  What was the message?  It was a laying of the groundwork of a very intricate piece of propaganda that was taking form that would foment future doubt in the voting public.

The rest of the story is even more insidious. After Kemp contacted Director Johnson and he was told that the Department of Homeland Security did not order such scans, he sent him proof that the scans were in fact from the DHS. Then, in a reversal of excuses, the Director said that a “vendor” in Texas was the culprit in a mistaken scan. Later still, in an email, the Director claimed that the vendor was from North Carolina.

If this breach by the DHS in February through November of last year, prior to and following the presidential election, was being obfuscated by the Director and the Obama administration, could such breaches have occurred in 39 other states?

In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database. Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.

I want you to take special note of the above paragraph from the BloombergPolitics report. Notice that, at no time, is Russia said to be the source of these hacks. And only when three “unnamed sources” are brought into the picture is the sudden leap in logic made that the hackers and the Russians are one and the same.

Rather than go further into this poor excuse for reporting and loose innuendo, I will refer you to the fact that often in these Russian hacking stories, the headlines suggest Russia, but the reports and the actual information from ongoing investigations will always conclude with “While it's unclear whether the Russians had direct control of these hacks or not, it certainly warrants further investigation.”

Lay on top of all of this the announcement by DHS that they needed to take over the entire election process due to potential cyberhacking:

“The federal government also has a responsibility to strengthen the security and resilience of its own critical infrastructure, for the continuity of national essential functions, and to organize itself to partner effectively with and add value to the security and resilience efforts of critical infrastructure owners and operators.”

If the breaches were and are being performed, perhaps the answer has been right under our noses this entire time: The Dept. of Homeland Security

This entire Russian hacking farce looks to be an orchestration that could very well have foundations dating back the Obama administration.

It is now more important than ever to realize that this alleged “red phone” warning call by the Obama administration to Moscow appears to be a retroactive attempt at creating even more of a “red herring” so that the diligent press are looking in every other direction except the one where our own intel community happens to be residing.

Source: BloombergPolitics / ZeroHedge

Image. HyScience



Leave a Reply

Pin It on Pinterest