Black Lives Matter has been criticized since its inception for its lack of clear policy goals. Instead, they’ve resorted to violence, vandalism, and chaos to make their point — as unclear as that may have been.
In the aftermath of the Dallas police massacre in 2016, two policies emerged from the controversial protest group. They want to totally disarm, demilitarize, defund, and disband the police, and they want reparations from white Americans.
One Black Lives matter organizer advocated for the latter policy point in an essay published in Wear Your Voice Magazine. In the piece, she demanded “housing, transportation, food, clothes, free space for meetings and work space; we need laptops, cell phones, encrypted systems for communication, solar power and LAND. ”
Why those systems of communications need to be encrypted is anyone’s guess — but it seems fairly obvious.
See Ashleigh Shackelford’s demands on the next page:
Stupid$#%&!@*
come n take it
This$#%&!@*got less brains than a woodpecker pecking on an aluminium telephone pole
An here’s what i think of you worthless f!&/’s!!
Go get it from the British, they brought slaves here before the USA was born…
THO THE LINK IN THIS POST KEEPS BEING MANIPULATED, IT PROVES THAT AMERICA, WE THE PEOPLES GREATEST COUNTRY ON EARTH, IS NOT A RACIST COUNTRY. SINCE THE LINK KEEPS BEING MANIPULATED, SAVE AND SHARE..,. http://www.e-ir.info/2014/12/12/barack-obama-how-an-unknown-senator-became-president-of-the-usa/
Upon analysing the results of the 2008 Presidential election it is clear to see that race proved to be no obstacle for Obama. Obama was not to fall victim to the ‘Wilder effect’ or ‘Bradley effect’, in which white voters would tell pollsters they planned to vote for the ethnic minority candidate, but, when it came to actually casting their ballot, they would vote for the white candidate (Brunell, 2009: pp 323). For instance, in 1989 Virginia candidate Douglas Wilder enjoyed a 15% point lead two weeks two weeks before the election, yet he only won by 6000 votes (Hopkins, 2009: pp 769). The results in 2008 clearly demonstrate a shift in attitudes away from the ‘Wilder & Bradley’ effect, as Obama won 44% of the white vote. Obama was to do particularly well among white voters who were younger than thirty, earning 54% of their support (Nelson, 2010: pp 17).Considering between 1968 and 2004, an average of 39% of white voters had supported Democratic candidates for president suggests that changing racial attitudes, Obamas deftness, Republican missteps and the economic crisis meant that real issues had more of a place than racial bias in 2008 (Harwood, 2008
Tough, I don’t Owe her anything. She needs to get off her$#%&!@*and make it on her own.
Smack those lips against a wall and she’ll stick.
Take that up with Obama, hillary ,oh wait they can’t do$#%&!@*for you free loading low life no more. Get off welfare and earn a living with a job. You’ve been paid long enough
White, Proud, and deplorable forever! You punks will get nothing!