The first town in America with a Muslim Majority city council is now making it’s first laws, and it seems residents’ fears of Sharia Law may be merited after all.
While the members of the Hamtramck, Michigan city council have denied that they would put religion into politics, their actions show otherwise. They’ve already banned alcohol sales within 500 feet of local mosques, and allowed daily calls to prayer to reverberate through town as early as 6am.
As both measures are intrinsically related to Islam, its hard to see how they’ve come to the conclusion that their actions are somehow non-religious in nature.
Rather, it seems as if they simply don’t care. As the town’s Polish population shrinks, the Muslim majority seems more than willing to institutionalize their religious beliefs in order to push the rest out.
See the town’s Polish mayor’s comments on the state of her town, continue reading on the next page:
No…must be stopped!
Someone needs to drive an airliner into that city hall.
We need a (LAW) Like we carried in the NAM.
Lol No they are not… Hamtramck is mixed right into to the city of Detroit… there is no Sharia going on here… just stop with this c**p.. if this was going on we would have burned the city to the ground already.
The incremental destruction of the American way of life has begun. Muslims are parasites on a community.
As America sleeps – chunks of her are falling away! WAKE UP!!!!!
Good to hear!
Sharia law
Sharia law is the law of Islam. The Sharia (also spelled Shariah or Shari’a) law is cast from the actions and words of Muhammad, which are called “Sunnah,” and the Quran, which he dictated. Sharia law itself cannot be altered but the interpretation of Sharia law, called “figh,” by imams is given some latitude.
As a legal system, Sharia law is exceptionally broad. While other legal codes regulate public behavior, Sharia law regulates public behavior, private behavior and even private beliefs. Of all legal systems in the world today, Sharia law is the most intrusive and restrictive, especially against women. According to Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).�• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.�• Criticizing Muhammad or denying that he is a prophet is punishable by death.�• Criticizing or denying Allah, the god of Islam is punishable by death.�• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.�• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.�• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.�• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.�• Girls’$#%&!@*should be cut (Muhammad’s words, Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).�• A woman can have 1 husband, who can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.�• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.�• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife; a woman needs her husband’s consent to divorce.�• A divorced wife loses custody of all children over 6 years of age or when they exceed it.�• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.�• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).�• A woman’s testimony in court, allowed in property cases, carries ½ the weight of a man’s.�• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.�• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah(upheaval).�• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.�• Meat to eat must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah – i.e., be “Halal”.�• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.�• The list goes on (see Sharia law in USA, UK, Europe & Saudi Arabia,$#%&!@*& Islam).
http://www.billionbibles.org/sharia/sharia-law.html
F**k islam
St. Thomas Aquinas’ Teaching Against the Infidel Mohammed
“He (Mohammed) seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.
He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the Contrary, Mohammed said that he was sent in the power of his arms – which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning (1). Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Mohammed forced others to become his follower’s by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and the New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place faith in his words believe foolishly.” – Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4.
Footnote: 1. Sura 21:5, Sura 44:14; Sura 16:103, Sura 37:36
Sura 21, The Prophets (Al-Anbyã’)
[21:5] They even said, “Hallucinations,” “He made it up,” and, “He is a poet. Let him show us a miracle like those of the previous messengers.”
Sura 44, Smoke
(44:14) “They had turned away from him [Muhammad] and said: a madman?”
Sura 16:103
We know indeed that they say,
“It is a man that teaches him.”
The tongue of him they wickedly point to
is notably foreign,
while this is Arabic, pure and clear.
Sura 37, The Arrangers (Al-Sãffãt)
[37:36] They said, “Shall we leave our gods for the sake of a crazy poet?”