When it comes to the left, free speech isn’t exactly an inalienable right. You see, it has to be free speech that they like. On college campuses, these liberal echo chambers are referred to as “safe spaces.” A safe space is somewhere a liberal can go where they don’t have to hear any speech they find offensive — essentially it’s a no-conservatives-allowed club. And if you try to violate a liberal’s safe space, they will often act emotionally — and sometimes violently.
When we coddle our (adult) children to believe that they should never have to hear anything that challenges their beliefs or offends them, it is no surprise that they leave college expecting these manufactured sanctuaries to exist in the real world.
The biggest post-university safe space of all? The climate change movement.
If you say anything contrary to the climate change alarmists they will react in a predictably distressed manner. Now, the left is actually considering ways in which they can legally punish those who dare cross the climate change industrial complex.
To read how Loretta Lynch and President Obama’s Justice Department is actually discussing taking legal action against those who do not subscribe to the global warming theory, continue reading on the next page:
Who is she kidding
Need to punish her, for plenty of things she’s done
Pee on her,this woman is a evil minion.
She needs to worry more about hillary and a little less on other bull$#%&!@*
The Old Testament talks about people in slavery because of people crying about climate change, GOD says the seasons will change…
She’sw supposed to be impartil! enforce the laws, not try to influence things! Every bit as bad as Holder!
BRING IT ON B!
What a joke. Climate change is a HOAX ment to bankrupt AMERICA and the Free World.
Stupid$#%&!@*
This asinine mockery of a U. S. Attorney General is worst than her predecessor. Instead of going after corrupt and murderous cops of blacks/people of color/the poor she played planet misfitness going after Sepp Blatter of FIFA as if hounding this man out of office would address the ugly issue referred to above. Then she reinstated the department’s rule against the police seizing civilians’s properties without just cause to fattening their wallets. Now she wants to interfere with people who deny climate change. Is this what the DOJ has become? A joke?