Former FBI Director Robert Mueller is winning plaudits from both sides of the aisle for being named by the Department of Justice to serve as special counsel to investigate allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election and rumors of collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign.
But given Democrat abhorrence of all things Russian, how will they react to Wikileaks’ disclosure that in 2009, then-Director Mueller delivered a sample of stolen highly enriched uranium to the Russians on a trip there.
Find out what prompted the Mueller mission to Russia and if it might raise questions regarding his current efforts to investigate the allegations of Russian meddling in the election. The answers are found on the next page.
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09STATE85588_a.html
Caught you
Sounds more like a hypocritical democrat to me! Maybe a conflict of interest??
damn what a bunch of corrupted people in DC. wow
Hard to find anybody honest in dc
That’s why they are accusing Trump the old smoke and mirror b******t
What on earth is he doing as FBI director. I thought we were gonna drain the swamp. He is part of the swamp. Ugh. He needs to be drained.
Is he part of deep state
This is being so blown out of proportion. Post USSR , we had an oversight agreement with watching over Russia’s control of fissile materials. We were concerned about the USSR fissile materials falling into the hands of terrorists. So, it looks like they set up a sting operation and caught a potential sale to terrorists of material to be used in a dirty bomb. A sample of that material was to be sent to Russia to see where it came from. This was in agreement with non proliferation agendas. It was the right thing to do and no big deal. Really folks, this is not something to hold against Mueller. Be smarter.
Wait… What…. No!