Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
theres a shock
Bradley Hardy : that’s because you are terrible at evaluating performance based on objective data. I don’t blame you for that, you get your information from sources that stand to gain from lying to you. Actually, I do kind of blame you for that.
Those are some of the ugliest faces i have ever seen
family of Rico act felons
You know, David Breyer, in my many decades on earth, I find it difficult to have a meaningful conversation with someone with a closed mind. I wish you a good life, really.
Damn chelsea your ugly.
Seriously, anyone shocked?
Yes they did this together
I agree with you Dale
So bust her already