Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Bradley Hardy and I don’t support people who gleefully take away people’s healthcare.
Chelsea Clinton!!!! THAT apple didn’t fall far from that tree………duh!!!! PUT BOTH OF THEM IN PRISON…………
I would like to see john Lewis screw Chelsie Clinton that would be the ugliest kid
Traitor Clinton’s
Give me a break!! Pull up your bloomers
DavidBreyer..seriously, things are better,,more ppl out of work than since the great depression, unemployment numbers are down because so many ppl ran out of benefits,more ppl on welfare since inception ,racail tension higher than its been since the 60/70’s , dropped our credit rating,,obozocare,,
So did Obama
Two turder.
she has a f**e dad too !!!
Ridiculous. It’s a common occurrence. People have screen names different than their real names. People have 2-3 email addresses they use for different purposes. You make a ‘nothing’ into a ‘something’. Ridiculous. Find a real problem.