Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
Pinnochio?
Treason
Put them both in jail
Skip Shoff well skip let’s pretend the only thing they are guilty of his having being gay? Do you put a bullet in their backs or in their fronts. Because you said CLEARLY that you’ll shoot someone right in their rainbow flag shirt. Want me to get the screenshot?
Jodi Pearson ok. For sake of argument Hillary and Obama have already been executed for treason. NOW can we take a closer look at the corrupt Donald Trump?
David Breyer
Must have learned from Obama and Clinton’s!
Marlene Furgason good one! Queen of the snappy comebacks.
Well gee davey i guess you got me there, if your trying to get me to say that i’m for or against gays well how ever i feel is my business so i guess you’ll have to take a chance and put your gay shirt back on and hope i’m not behind you
Lie. Lie, lie. Cover, cover, cover.
Jodi Pearson : I get that you oppose Hillary because you believe these accusations are true. However, the fact that you believe these things proves you are bad at evaluating what is objectively true. This is clearly a b******t political hit job with no basis in reality. But hey, don’t beat yourself up. Everybody is bad at some things. For you it’s thinking and reasoning. Stick with the things you’re good at. Whatever that is.