Hillary Clinton’s repeated claim that she did not know she was breaking the law when she misused her email servers just got that much harder to buy following yet another shocking revelation.
For someone to not know they are breaking the law, it would have to be proven that the individual acted in a way that would indicate they were genuinely unaware of any statues prohibiting the behavior or act in question. Of course, ignorance of the law is no excuse for breaking it, but at least it shows the person was acting in good faith and not actively trying to violate the law.
Turn to the next page for more info:
But doesn’t fall too far from the tree!
She is relevant because she broke laws and should be held accountable for it!!!
Two criminals what’s new
What a ugly couple ..
Tyranny runs deep in that family…
Creepy Clintons
How can she keep the lies straight
Beauty is only skin deep. But UGLY is too the bone.
Crooked mother teaching daughter how to be crooked. What a shame for Clinton legacy!
Skip Shoff SKIP! I’ve been wanting to talk to you! Did you mean what you said before in a previous thread when I said ” is it ok to shoot a man in the back” and YOU said “depends on what side of the shirt his rainbow flag is on”? So I want to clarify if you were saying it’s ok to shoot gays?