Leave it to the hosts of The View to mouth off about that which they know nothing about.
Given the show’s abominably-liberal bias, there was little doubt that the panel would take advantage of the horrific massacre in Orlando to spout the half-baked anti-gun platitudes like they always do when such a tragedy occurs. One particular comment from Whoopi Goldberg, however, stood out due to it’s mind-boggling wrongness.
Now, Goldberg is known and honored for being a lot of things, but an expert on gun policy and constitutional law is not one of them. Yet, this hasn’t stopped the left-wing comedian from chastising gun owners for not surrendering to her fellow gun grabbers. Irritated by Americans continued dismissal of her demands for gun control, Goldberg angrily declared that the Second Amendment doesn’t mean people can buy “hundreds of guns.” She was very adamant about this point, but not so much about explaining what led her to conclude this and why others should too.
Watch Goldberg’s anti-gun tirade on the next page:
Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902
DECEMBER. 20, 2014
The$#%&!@*Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.
The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.
The$#%&!@*Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.
The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.
Attorney General Wickersham advised President Taft, “the Organized Militia (the National Guard) can not be employed for offensive warfare outside the limits of the United States.”
The Honorable William Gordon, in a speech to the House on Thursday, October 4, 1917, proved that the action of President Wilson in ordering the Organized Militia (the National Guard) to fight a war in Europe was so blatantly unconstitutional that he felt Wilson ought to have been impeached.
During the war with England an attempt was made by Congress to pass a bill authorizing the president to draft 100,000 men between the ages of 18 and 45 to invade enemy territory, Canada. The bill was defeated in the House by Daniel Webster on the precise point that Congress had no such power over the militia as to authorize it to empower the President to draft them into the regular army and send them out of the country.
The fact is that the President has no constitutional right, under any circumstances, to draft men from the militia to fight outside the borders of the USA, and not even beyond the borders of their respective states. Today, we have a constitutional LAW which still stands in waiting for the legislators to obey the Constitution which they swore an oath to uphold.
Charles Hughes of the American Bar Association (ABA) made a speech which is contained in the Appendix to Congressional Record, House, September 10, 1917, pages 6836-6840 which states: “The militia, within the meaning of these provisions of the Constitution is distinct from the Army of the United States.” In these pages we also find a statement made by Daniel Webster, “that the great principle of the Constitution on that subject is that the militia is the militia of the States and of the General Government; and thus being the militia of the States, there is no part of the Constitution worded with greater care and with more scrupulous jealousy than that which grants and limits the power of Congress over it.”
“This limitation upon the power to raise and support armies clearly establishes the intent and purpose of the framers of the Constitution to limit the power to raise and maintain a standing army to voluntary enlistment, because if the unlimited power to draft and conscript was intended to be conferred, it would have been a useless and puerile thing to limit the use of money for that purpose. Conscripted armies can be paid, but they are not required to be, and if it had been intended to confer the extraordinary power to draft the bodies of citizens and send them out of the country in direct conflict with the limitation upon the use of the militia imposed by the same section and article, certainly some restriction or limitation would have been imposed to restrain the unlimited use of such power.”
The Honorable William Gordon
Congressional Record, House, Page 640 – 1917
I thought she would have left the U.S. by now.
Too much stupidity to even begin…
Fu#$ you Bit@*
You are an uneducated ignorant racist whore whoopie
She is a VILE person. She needs to get her$#%&!@*out of the USA>
She’s like a festering boil on my ass
As menny as you want
Carlos Rivera , Just in case you missed it !! Some of those ” Fast n Furious ” arms also wound up in the Paris , France Disco Tech mass shooting !!! They were tracked backwards to coming out of Miami,Fl. from Mexico !!!!! How nice that is of the DOJ & Obama !!!!
Carlos , The 2nd Amendment: **A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.**
Translated for dummies: **In order to remain in a state of freedom it may be necessary to form, supply and train a militia (thus making it regulated) from an already armed populace since being armed is the most practical way to utilize the natural (born with) right of self-preservation and for the protection of one’s family and community. Since this natural right was not given by the government it cannot take it back nor restrict it (infringe). It can only be surrendered willingly by the foolish.**
Also when “people” are mentioned in the Constitution does it only mean “some” people or “certain” people or does it mean “all” people (citizens)? If it then means “all” people then notice what the last part of the 2nd A says: the right of the **PEOPLE** TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. It does not say only the people that are in the militia can bear arms but just people as in all people. Of course the fact that all people are also the militia should come into to play too.
“I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.”
— George Mason
“The militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves, … all men capable of bearing arms;…”
— “Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic”, 1788 (either Richard Henry Lee or Melancton Smith