Something fishy is going on in Pennsylvania.
Donald Trump may not have won the popular vote, but he won the electoral college decisively. Still, that didn’t stop Green Party candidate Jill Stien from demanding a recount in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan — the three states that landed Trump in the White House.
That recount effort has been ridiculed by many for its uselessness. Even in the near-impossible even that the results in both Wisconsin and Michigan were overturned, Trump would still have the necessary electoral votes to beat Hillary Clinton. Only by switching Pennsylvania could a recount change the outcome of the election — an extremely unlikely event considering that Trump’s margin in the state was much bigger than his in Wisconsin and Michigan.
But that margin in apparently getting smaller. The latest numbers in Pensylvania show that Clinton has gained several thousand votes compared to the election night tallies.
See how massive the suspicious shift toward Clinton is on the next page:
LOL!
Judith Schnarrs laugh it up antiChristian communist. But you can’t complain when we live in East Germany.
Don’t click!!!
It’s a lie!!!
Get over it. She lost. I got over the DNC conspiring against Bernie, so you guys can get over war mongering, corporate shill Clinton losing to Trump.
I would put this under F**E NEWS as there is no recount in that state.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/us/pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-end-election-recount-efforts.html?_r=0
As usual
Oh Good Grief!! Give it up already!!! You lost … get over it!!!!
in California? Ilegals, dead people, ???? These don’t count!
It’s called a recount for a reason that reason being that someone may have made a mistake costing her thousands of votes in the first place
Liberal fraud at its finest