Something fishy is going on in Pennsylvania.
Donald Trump may not have won the popular vote, but he won the electoral college decisively. Still, that didn’t stop Green Party candidate Jill Stien from demanding a recount in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan — the three states that landed Trump in the White House.
That recount effort has been ridiculed by many for its uselessness. Even in the near-impossible even that the results in both Wisconsin and Michigan were overturned, Trump would still have the necessary electoral votes to beat Hillary Clinton. Only by switching Pennsylvania could a recount change the outcome of the election — an extremely unlikely event considering that Trump’s margin in the state was much bigger than his in Wisconsin and Michigan.
But that margin in apparently getting smaller. The latest numbers in Pensylvania show that Clinton has gained several thousand votes compared to the election night tallies.
See how massive the suspicious shift toward Clinton is on the next page:
She needed all 3 states to win and one has been shut down by court.
An article that spells Stein isn’t worth reading.
Gail Bradford how do you that isn’t Gods will. If you believe it has to be both ways!!
C’mon, man! This is f**e news. Wasn’t Hillary whining about this$#%&!@*
Smells of Election Fraud.
Its called “voter fraud” and is cureable overnight using biometrics, a technology which the Left adamantly opposes. And with good reason – they have no message and lose every time without illegal votes.
What a gullible bunch. Oh, this is so liberals will get fired up! Noooo, it’s meant to fire up all the morons that’ll believe almost anything. Wow, pizza anyone?
LOL!
Phony news story. Where are Marky’s truth police?
This is again f**e news, we all know Hillary got more votes, but Trump won.