Something fishy is going on in Pennsylvania.
Donald Trump may not have won the popular vote, but he won the electoral college decisively. Still, that didn’t stop Green Party candidate Jill Stien from demanding a recount in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan — the three states that landed Trump in the White House.
That recount effort has been ridiculed by many for its uselessness. Even in the near-impossible even that the results in both Wisconsin and Michigan were overturned, Trump would still have the necessary electoral votes to beat Hillary Clinton. Only by switching Pennsylvania could a recount change the outcome of the election — an extremely unlikely event considering that Trump’s margin in the state was much bigger than his in Wisconsin and Michigan.
But that margin in apparently getting smaller. The latest numbers in Pensylvania show that Clinton has gained several thousand votes compared to the election night tallies.
See how massive the suspicious shift toward Clinton is on the next page:
Election is over.
Even when she cheated she lost!
Wait something is funny that more voted for President than down the ticket? Maybe those who did not vote for Senate Race … no maybe they just didnt bother with the rest of ballot. I know some who did not vote for President but did vote for the other races on their ballot … so what.
Story blocked by scam pop up adds
When dimocrats count votes the grow, like mold. They appear out of nowhere and then they cluck about the Russians. Boring and predictable.
Sore losers. They need to go their asses back to Arkansas
simple ! they cheat lie steal an they are crooks !
recounts are the perfect opportunity to “stuff” ballot boxes
Judge shuts down vote recount in Michigan because of voter fraud – the machines having counted single Clinton votes up to six times.
I was just in PA, no way she’s finding more votes! Trump signs everywhere!