The movement against the BLM and Forestry Service western lands takeover continues to build, with the aftermath of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge demonstration and the slaying of rancher LaVoy Finicum by federal agents serving as a rallying point for those who believe the federal government has grown too big and powerful, particularly in the western states. Don’t miss the video included later in the article.
The compliant media has circled the wagons to declare the demonstrators were radical, right-wing constitutionalists, as if the U.S. Constitution can be protected and promoted too much.
Somehow, those who dismiss the ranchers and their supporters in the western states can’t see that the government, which “owns” over 50 percent of the land in eleven western states, is much more interested in power and control, and much more committed to radical environmentalists than to farmers and ranchers trying to make a living on the land that, like as not, has been a family pursuit and way of life for generations.
To put a finer point on the issue, mere weeks after the Malheur protesters were arrested and the refuge cleared, President Obama declared three more parcels of land in California as federal land, with little or no future access granted to mere citizens of the state. And by parcels, I mean almost 2 million acres that are now set aside as an offering to the Sierra Club and their ilk, with no compensation offered to California for the taking.
Federal government supporters are painting protesters as lawless cowboys, ignoring the fact that the Constitution prohibits the federal government from owning more than a ten square mile plot in Washington D.C., and areas for forts and military installations that require state approval to acquire.
Watch as the Sheriff fights back in video on the next page:
No problem with colored poeple rioting in Freguson and Baltimore but in Utah . ?
I can’t see this. The constitution does give the U.S. government the power to own and regulate land, and the Sagebrush rebellion could be considered treason. Furthermore, if these militants follow their own logic, they should return the land to the Indians. I understand ranchers feeling their way of life is threatened, but they don’t have law or logic on their side.
I contacted his office to volunteer, leaving my number with the lady who answered and he never returned my call.. and that was over a week ago. so im not sure how serious he is.
I agree absolutely..
Christopher Lee Kirkwood No, we as citizens of our individual States can own STATE parks. All federal parks should be returned to the states wherein they lie.
So, this small town sheriff is going to arrest all the feds? Is he on drugs?
A few of you may think this is ‘ fear mongering’, but those probably think the recent California murders were ‘work place violence’ not ‘terrorism’. Wake up and get over your ‘politically correct’ idiocy. Obama is a Muslim. “Infiltration” is taking place in America. Islam is a theocracy masquerading as a religion!
Can Muslims Be Good Americans?
This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish and send it on to everyone. Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.
Can a good Muslim be a good American? This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years.
The following is his reply:
Theologically – no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia.
Religiously – no. . . . Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256)(Koran)
Scripturally – no. . . Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.
Geographically – no… Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
Socially – no. . . Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.
Politically – no. . . Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan. Domestically – no. . . Because he is instructed to marry four Women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34 )
Intellectually – no. . Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
Philosophically – no. . . . Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
Spiritually – no. . . . Because when we declare ‘one nation under God,’ the Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation…. Perhaps we should be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. – – – They obviously cannot be both ‘good’ Muslims and good Americans. Call it what you wish it’s still the truth. You better believe it. The more who understand this, the better it will be forour country and our future.
The religious war is bigger than we know or understand.
Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within. It is called “infiltration.
Is this guy serious?? He sounds like it!!!
B******t
Let see how that turns out.