Elections obviously have consequences, and one of those is manifested in the impact a president has on the makeup of the federal courts. When thinking about a president’s judicial nominations, attention typical is focused on the US Supreme Court since it makes the final decisions on matters of law. Yet, the district courts and appellate courts are very important as well, especially since not all cases appealed to the Supreme Court will be heard by that body, leaving the decision made by the lower court to stand as ruled.
Cases involving the Second Amendment are highly controversial, due largely to the entrenched interests on both side of the debate over an American’s right to keep and bear arms. Such a case has just been decided at the appellate court level, and the implications are serious. More on page two.
Previous administration looked for ways to remove our firearms so it would make it easier fora other group to take us over. Be ready is my moto.
Is that the same$#%&!@*that said if the victims are unarmed they’ll put down their weapons. Like ate the Boston Marathon, the bar in Orlando.
It makes every law enforcement officer dangerous for the exact same reason. This is a flawed narrative.
Amen to that.
True statement… im dangerous to terrorists, thugs, drug dealers, rapists, rioters, and unruly mind manipulated democrats… yes im dangerous
Ignorance at it’s Liberal worst.
Hmmm…
Perhaps *potentially more dangerous, in the event of a violent conflict, but not implicitly so..
This is obvious.
But it seems the implication being made here is that armed people should be viewed as more threatening.
And this isn’t so.
Dangerous for the criminal and corrupt individuals. Everyone has a birthright to self preservation, a birthright to defend your own life.
OLNY if you are a criminal
“Free speech is dangerous. Freedom is dangerous. Exercising our God given rights are dangerous.” say tyrants.