The United Nationals Human Rights Council (UNHRC) has issued a report critical of the United States practice of detaining would-be immigrants to determine their appropriate status.
What makes this news ironic is that some of the Council members are hardly shining lights of liberty. But its work is typical of the “open borders” bias that infects the United Nations and other globalist organizations as a whole.
For some reason, the fact that the United States still wants to maintain some semblance of sovereignty is offensive to many in the world community today. Considering all the possible places that asylum seekers and refugees would want to go, the good old USA would be at the very top of the list.
On the next page, learn more about some of the Council members and their gross hypocrisy in attacking U.S. human rights and immigration policies. Find out UNHRC’s specific complaints, and how they run counter to common sense.
The UN has nothing to do with this country no demands
thanks but no thanks…
Have North Korea take some immigrants
The UN has no authority over my president.
The un can suck a$#%&!@*
Not a problem. Just ask the countries making the demand how many we can send them. We’ll be nice and pay the shipping too.
Nothing wrong in defining status for immigrants
There is absolutely no reason the U.N. cant set up safe zone’s in refugee’s hope country’s….an keep them there….That’s what the U.N. is there for…not dictating to other countrys how they should accept “IMMIGRANT’S” that hate us an have no intention’s of assimilating ….
Leave the un and stop funding them!
Do away with the UN! Throw them out of the country!