In yet another huge blow to our Constitution, the Supreme Court ruled in Jan 2015 that a police officer can violate your 4th Amendment rights if they make a ‘reasonable’ mistake regarding the law.
If you are ignorant of the law, that is no excuse, but if a cop is ignorant of the law, he can violate your rights.
As incredible as it sounds, any cop can ‘play dumb’ and proceed to do anything he wants to you and feel secure that his excuse of ignorance will shield him.
How in the hell can a cop be expected to uphold the law if he doesn’t even know the law?
SEE PAGE 2 TO CONTINUE:
better them trained specifically concerning the 4th amendment to the cons$#%&!@*ution, especially the feds…..
How convenient, I’m sure this will cause many of them to “not know the law”.
We must reduce government funding immediately to prevent men with masks and machine guns from becoming civilian law enforcement officials.
This $#%&!@* needs to be stomped out……cold…..!
Cops should be forced to learn the law before a badge is given to them
I will die, defending mine.
As far as I know, they do . But, I guess that I’m wrong!! I call for the dismissal of the whole Supreme Court!! Start over.
THEM MAY THEY DIE TRYING!! THEY ALWAYS SAY IGNORANCE IS NO EXCUSE FOR BREAKING TO LAW SO IT ONLY MAKES SENSE THAT IT WOULD BE THERE DIMISE!!!
“Where officers do not conform to the ‘law of the land’ they have
no authority and the right to resist them exists. A Public Officer,
as with a citizen, who unlawfully threatens life or liberty, is
susceptible to be injured or killed; for by such acts ‘they draw
their own blood upon themselves’ As stated in some cases, ‘where
a peace officer has no right to make an arrest without warrant he
is a tresp$#%&!@*er and acts at his own peril.” 6A CJS., “Arrest”
Section 16 page 30; A sheriff who “acts without process,” or
“under a process void on its face, in doing such act, he is not to
be considered an officer but a personal tresp$#%&!@*er.” Roberts v. Dean,
187 So. 571, 575 (Fla. 1939)
I see and who will back this