In yet another huge blow to our Constitution, the Supreme Court ruled in Jan 2015 that a police officer can violate your 4th Amendment rights if they make a ‘reasonable’ mistake regarding the law.
If you are ignorant of the law, that is no excuse, but if a cop is ignorant of the law, he can violate your rights.
As incredible as it sounds, any cop can ‘play dumb’ and proceed to do anything he wants to you and feel secure that his excuse of ignorance will shield him.
How in the hell can a cop be expected to uphold the law if he doesn’t even know the law?
SEE PAGE 2 TO CONTINUE:
Violate my 4th I’ll use my 2nd. I still have the right to defend myself and my castle whether you know it or not. No cop, no judge, and no government can take that from me.
The cons$#%&!@*ution is the only law….Not the supreme court…
Hope not no police state
Fourth Amendment Simplified Text
The basic rule laid down by the 4th Amendment is this: Police officers have no general right to search for or seize evidence or seize (arrest) persons. Except in particular cir$#%&!@*stances, they must have proper warrant (a court order) obtained with probable cause (on reasonable grounds). This guarantee is reinforced by the exclusionary rule, developed by the Supreme Court: Evidence gained as a result of an unlawful search for seizure cannot be used at the court trial of the person from whom it was seized.
now we all know!
Scary
Ignorance of the law will cost you money
they shouldnt be cops then if they dont know how to do the job?
Ignorance of the law will make you the fall guy
Kawawa iyong hindi nakapag aral
Hila yay to totorpewon
THERE WILL BE A LOT OF LAW SUITS OVER IT THOUGH AND THE STATE WILL PAY BIG!!