Greg Littell, writing for a Western Nevada journal called “The Union,” has said in a op-ed article that the idea of armed rebellion against a tyrannical United States would be impossible because of a perceived weapons disparity. Essentially, Mr. Littell believes that a militia conceivably armed with AR-15s would be forced to back down because this tyrant could threaten to use nuclear weapons. Therefore, the only “rational course” to take would be Gandhi-esque civil disobedience and that refusing to work would grind the tyrannical government to a halt. Let’s back up a little and really analyze what Mr. Littell is saying.
First of all, let’s not be Polly-Annish about this. Barack Obama has already enforced his will on federal and state governments repeatedly in order to instill his liberal agenda on the American citizen. Between stuffing Syrian “refugees” into whatever corners of America will take them, attacking our Second Amendment rights, and repressing Christian Americans, Obama could already be called something of a tyrant. All that really remains between Barack Obama leaving office in 2016 and Barack Obama becoming President-For-Life is the support of the military. However, Obama has repeatedly slandered military leaders and attacked military establishments and traditions, so it is safe to assume the military would not back an Obama-led dictatorship. Any overtures of retaining his Presidency after the end of his office term would be quashed by the dutiful generals who serve on behalf of the American people.
Secondly, why would soldiers launch nukes on their own homes? Greg Littell is laboring under a literary fantasy more befitting a Tom Clancy novel than domestic politics. Mr. Littell’s genocidal fantasy may work for his own whims to quash Obama-dissenters, but fails to consider that the men behind the button are better Americans than he is and would be unwilling to act so coldly on their own families. One wonders what Mr. Littell imagines he would do?
Let’s accept the scenario Mr. Littell has given us. What would you do if Obama wrested control of the military, enacted martial law and you’ve taken up arms to cast him out of power? If this is the case, how would patriots get around federal maneuvers to launch nuclear missiles on American cities?
Read out more about Greg Littell’s article and a counterpoint on page 2.
Bring it you isis punks.we have the guns you idiot. Even the mob and notorious biker gangs are after you and they just don’t care.
Remember what happened at
the beginning of the French Revolution? The state ordered the military to fire on the revolutionaries, but the military turned and fired on them.
The IQs around here speak of Left Behind schooling…
It ain’t the nukes we’ve gotta worry about; even Obama would hesitate to unleash the fallout into the prevailing winds. It’s the planes, conventional bombs, choppers, tanks, artillery, machine guns, mortars, grenades, rockets, 3CI, and the like that would make it difficult to succeed.
Led by foxnews and Glenn Beck, no doubt.
Don’t be so niev, the government would convince our military that they were launching weapons against some perceived threat but the cordinants may be somewhere else.
I hope our military are not that stupid
I am a veteran, they have no control of the cordinants. If I gave you a abunch of encoded numbers how would you know what they meant?
Sounds like how isis and the nazis party was started…
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE NUMBERS IF WE ARE TRUELY AMERICANS. AND IN SUCH IS EQUAL TO POWER. WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO THINK ABOUT THE WAY WE SHOULD FIGHT!