Liberal court decisions are also imposed by preventing selected cases from being presented before the court. With the death of Justice Scalia, court ideology is evenly split, and justice is therefore less likely to be determined, and partisan mandates will instead be memorialized.
One pending case before the court is a challenge to Obama’s outrageous and unconstitutional decision to issue an executive order to ignore the immigration laws of this country, and to prohibit the border patrol and the immigration department from enforcing the law and deporting illegal aliens according to the law.
Obama dreams of adding somewhere between eleven and twenty five million voters to the Democrat roles by nationalizing these illegal immigrants, and he has been willing to flout any law or precedent to make that happen. And while this is a very big issue and could change the entire landscape of the country, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott indicates that the consequences will be much larger if Obama’s wilful lawlessness is allowed to stand.
See Gov. Abbott’s arguments against Obama’s actions, page 2:
Do it obama over write them and show then what can be don’t. Hate in is self and decrimation is a crime
SCOTUS WOULD BE GUILTY OF TREASON!!!
He is not our King
He can “not” write law,and he can “not” change the law.But he can do whatever we let him get away with.
He can not but we set an let it happen.
Which part of Treason did you forget? he has NO Authority and Belongs in prison
Scotus does not “decide, rule” anything whatsoever and believing so gives them the very same power you’re blaming the Potus for claiming!
Our Supreme Law/Constitution is clear and in plain English. It doesn’t need Interpreting or Reinterpreting and if it did it certainly “shouldn’t” be an entity that’s controlled by it and actually in our framing, the weakest Entity
OBAMA HAS NO RIGHTS..HE IS A ILLEGAL SO ANYTHING HE DOES OR SAYS IS NO GOOD AND ILLEGAL TOO…GET HIS$#%&!@*OUT NOW ????
Why is congrass litting this go on ? Because congtess is putting money in there pockets, that’s why.
No, the way you’ve worded it he is still in breach of our Supreme Law. He must be tasked by Congress. Not take it upon himself and task Congress with approving his actions!