The Supreme Court has just given law enforcement the right to enter one’s home without a warrant.
In a 6-3 decision, Justice Alito penned that, “When occupants of a residents disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector,” Read page 2 for background on the case and ruling.
Try reading the article, not just the headline and spewing out the same hundred comments that came before you.
Here I’ll help you…
“Dissenting, Justices Stotomayor, Ginsburg and Kagan (democrats, only 2 of which (Sotomayor and Kagan) were appointed by Obama) found that the decisions was an erosion of the Fourth Amendment.
“Instead of adhering to the warrant requirement,” Ginsburg said, “today’s decision tells the police they may dodge it, never mind ample time to secure the approval of a neutral magistrate.”
There was a 6 (republicans) to 3 (democrats) ruling.
Also, I found it strange that the author used the wrong homophone (no, that doesn’t mean a gay phone) when referring to the home. It’s residence, ” not “residents.”
No I’m not an Obama lover and yes I disagree with this ruling. Just think many of your comments are ridiculous and you obviously didn’t read.
Nope because a$#%&!@*country
good way of getting shot, this is still America. they better have a warrant
I now know the Supreme Court majority have become nazis, and joint the black$#%&!@*in the white house.
Go to theirs FIRST.
The SC is attempting to nullify the Constitution.
Hopefully, they realize the illegality of their actions before they attempt such foolishness. Illegal search and seizure will only injure more and more people trying to protect and serve the public.
thanks for the warning u dumbasses come on in I got a surprise 4 U
Let them try!
bring pleny of body bags