The Supreme Court has just given law enforcement the right to enter one’s home without a warrant.
In a 6-3 decision, Justice Alito penned that, “When occupants of a residents disagree on whether they will admit police without a warrant, the objecting occupant must be physically present. That doesn’t change if police have removed the objector,” Read page 2 for background on the case and ruling.
The Supreme Court judges must all be senile!!! Remove them all and replace them with competent judges.
This bothers me but I do not have to walk in their shoes. LORD help.
Bull sh$t
It has to do with the homeland security secretary is muslim.
No they can;t
That’s a hugely misleading headline. All the court did is uphold the right to do a consent search if one of the residents consents. This isn’t even a new ruling. This is how paranoid c**p gets started.
No they can’t.
Would love to blame him but it started back in 1953 due to-get this-border problems. The law was adopted without public knowledge and was used to seize and search. It is still on the books today which means at any given time citizens could be searched and possessions taken:vehicles, cell phones, computers etc.
It’s called stand and fight or be a slave. A dead free man is better off then a live slave.
good way to get a face full of triple oo buckshot.. in some places they shoot first ask questions later.