The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
Invasive
well criminals are violent yet they seem to always have a gun and don’t get a back ground check…… it sounds good but they are slowly eroding your rights…… most domestic violence does not involve a gun and most people who murder and kill are not licensed gun owners … probably will mean that more domestic violence will not be reported
How can you be convicted of domestic violence if NO ACTUAL VIOLENCE WAS PROVED??? Are you SCOTUS JUDGES DUMB? OR ARE YOU JUST STUPID???
It’s not in the Constitution to regulate guns like this. The Supreme Court is allover the place when interpreting the Constitution. There doesn’t seem to be any consistency…just whatever a vocal group screams about the most. How can this country work when the Constitution is treated thusly?
time to press the reset button on our government
Sorry assed judges
This is how the communist took over Russia, the confiscated all the guns. Then they murdered 22 million men,women and children that were DEEMED enemies of the government. So it starts.
Bill says:
“Look at the perameters of what is a militia before you write another word. We the people are the milita by US birth. Read the facts not just a portion.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence-offender/comment-page-10/#comment-347224
not my problem
Truth and Action …
Then based on Bill’s comment on which yu shared.
If we the people are the militia, then the 2nd Amendment says we are to be “Well Regulated” ….