The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
It seems our government and our judges are all $#%&!@*s and first-class !!!
I know police who have had a PFA filed against them —- are they now out of a job?? Or is there selective enforcement ???
Dont agree with it, but better than what they were asking for. They wanted everytime a domestic violence call is answered by police, if violence was involved or not, you lost your right.
What… did I miss something
Cops commit domestic violence more than $#%&!@*ing anyone
Here is my biggest gripe, “Shall not be infringed” means that this
This is illegal. DEFY THEM!
very wrong decision
That’s BS
citizen says:
“read the article, it says you just have to be involved in ANY domestic violence.”
From: http://www.truthandaction.org/supreme-court-guns-domestic-violence-offender/comment-page-10/#comment-347080