The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
America is in serious trouble, when even The Supreme Court does not respect The Constitution!
no that not right
Here is a Warning to all men,,,Don’t talk, or Touch or look at a Woman ever again,, The Communists just found the one big Weak link to dis arm most of America,,,, If She doesn’t own a gun, or Hunt, You need to get any, and Everything up front in writing, what You can say and do on a Date…If She won’t do that !.. Don’t Touch it!
Haha people don’t understand the constitution clearly. When you break the law, you are no longer entitled to all of your rights. That’s how it works. There are consequences. Serious enough offenses, you lose freedoms. You are violent enough to be charged with domestic violence, they rule you may no longer own a gun legally. Don’t agree with it, fine. You are entitled to. But to call it unconstitutional by any means shows a lack of understanding of how rights and the constitution works.
I’m convinced that it’s possible to be so smart that you’re actually stupid. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED…. Not if this….. Or after that…..SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
2014 2016
I HAVE NEVER LIKED VIOLENCE UNLESS IT IS IN SELF DEFENSE, PERIOD, NO EXCEPTIONS… AS FAR AS THE LAW, EACH CASE SHOULD BE EVALUATED INDIVIDUALLY..
I totally agree with Roger A. Brooks.!!!!!
How r they found guilty if no violence was proven ?
they need to take mentality 101 again.they are out of touch with common sense/