The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
That’s crazy
I’d suggest the author here take a class or two in constitutional law. Rights are rarely absolute.
Burt Scott Staggs your the ugly mofo and the hat Swiss it all
we have to get rid of those tin gods they are all bought and paid for this country is going to hell
I just saw a post in online yard sales where a man works at night, and his wife saw a man lurking in his window. Ladies, if you have any doubt your man isn’t being domestic violent and your mad because of money or something, you should let it go. Because each one that dials 911 in anger is one less to protect how the country boys roll. cb
Just another way for the gun grabbers to get peoples guns. This is not Constitutional and the Congress needs to take action against it.
“Domestic Violence” conviction should not prevent one from owning a gun. Don’t forget: Knives, Tire Irons, Mace, Acid, Screw Drivers, Cleavers, Wasp Spray, Tazers, Baseball Bats, Spears, Bow & Arrows, Automobiles, Golf Clubs, Ice Picks, or ANYTHING one can do harm to or be used to murder another human being with.
Political correctness has got to stop. Why don’t we ban idiots instead?
Impeach Obama today.
Vicki could not have said it better