The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
This ruling is clearly unconstitutional and even the COURTS CANNOT violate the rights of citizens or conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the
Constitution or under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution. To do so is a FELONY under federal law punishable by a fine of not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life or for death.
If they are convicted, I agree, but if they are found not guilty no way.
They can go to hell I bought my guns so they are mine
WAKE UP-IS NAZY TIME=WW3&UFO HELL INVASION
COME HOME
they’ll just use another method to kill or use go to the black market gun laws don’t stop you from getting a gun
Screw the UN
they have to understand that you don,t need a gun to comit vilonce
The Supreme Court is no place for Activist judges. Each one should be disbarred w/no opportunity for appeal. Then maybe they will understand the ignorance of their reasoning for themselves…
9 to 0 that’s strong.