The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
Wait ——— I know police that have had PFA’s filed against them and they are still working as police ……….
As far as I’m concerned, any gun restriction or law is a direct violation of the 2nd Amendment!
2nd amendment
Thank god im never doing another relationship……not even being accused.
The 2nd and 9th over rule those fools. they are enforcing treason.
I am a retired police officer and I agree… believe it or not domestic violence and guns do not go hand and hand… and if they do they are used to protect the innocent…
They are the terrorist and work for Monsanto . They should pass a law for those who soft kill us all by slow death by poisoning out food and air.
You have any idea how many BS domestic charges there are out there… Thats c**p!
What’s to stop an angry woman, or a anti gun woman from calling or filling a report.
that’s nice, there’s only two problems, not infringed means not be encroached or limited….define the words if liberals are too stupid, and if they say it, then it’s just using ignorance to use sharia law rather than the constitution…all we really need to do is start shooting these anti-constitutional $#%&!@*s and treat them as enemies of the state….republicans need to motivate, we have more money than liberals….we don’t beg for blunts and 40 ounces…..we buy it if we want it…..oh well….