The Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 vote strengthened the law that states if someone is found guilty of domestic violence, even if no actual violence was proved, they can’t own a gun.
What part of ‘shall not be infringed’ regarding the 2nd Amendment do these ‘justices’ not understand?
To take someone’s gun because they have been involved in domestic violence will NOT stop domestic violence from occurring in the future.
These 2 issues are not related in any way.
See Page 2 For Complete Story:
This is nothing more then another gun grab of taking the rights of BOTH because in most cases both the accused and the beaten got jail. So both lose the rights to bear arms. And so much for the word rehabilitated. Even our founders said rights were to be restored once your debt was paid to society. And when was the last time a person who got the police called on them for say loud noise where nothing was going on, but still arrested for domestic violence shoot up a school? ABOUT NEVER! Time to vote these scumbags out of office and get these judges removed!
except for cops they are exempt from this law cause they beat their wives all the time….
It is a back door way to get rid of guns
The Supreme Court has been bought and paid for by corporate America….Bend over and grab yo ankles….freedom is gone…..
Ray Rice , your application has been denied…
Just say “no” to violence… and calm heads must prevail !
This is BULL$#%&!@*. They are doing everthing 2 DISARM US.
OUR COURT IS ANTI-AMERICAN. GOD HELP US.
sounds like a lot of cops will be losing their jobs
Boy this is no $#%&!@*, neither issue is even remotely related yet they still keep trying to associate one with the other. The sad part is that a person can lose their guns even if they have done nothing, I’ve seen someone get arrested just because one of the couple calls the cops even though nothing violent never happened.