After years of debate, the South Carolina House passed a bill to block Islamic sharia law from being recognized or approved in the state. The legislation was passed with sixty-eight for the bill and forty-two opposed. For those of you who don’t know, sharia law is the legal and political system mandated in the Koran and other
Islamic texts includes laws governing religious practice, divorce, child-rearing, free-speech, clothing, sexual behavior and a plethora of other things that the government should really have no control over. These are the guiding principles of those who practice Islam.
Knowing this, it seems rather contradicting that liberals are so persistent on protecting Muslims and seeing that everybody goes out of their way to respect their practices, especially since sharia law makes women and non-Muslims lesser in status and grants men enormous power over wives, daughters and sons. It also allows for “honor killings” by fathers for anybody who refuses to comply.
Read more about this bill on the next page.
A Great Day in South Carolina
Liberals from sea to shinning sea will be in another uproar.
all states should do the same to keep out goat humpers.
Jorge Perez
Such big words from an uneducated homunculus.
You come to America you live by American laws. You practice your own laws…You GO to jail !!
NO EXCEPTIONS !!
This is the United States of America and ONLY American law are RECOGNIZED. Go home to your own country if you want Sharia Law. NOT HERE IN THE USA……
Thank you Obumer for allowing this to happen.
George Soros’s Money, Saul Alinsky’s ideas, and Barack Obama’s, Valerie Jarrett’s, Joe Biden’s, Bernie Sanders’s, and Hilary Clinton’s liberal Democrats.
Hilary’s lies do not change history.
Obama’s State Department Treason.
History tells us a different story.
After the dead bodies are counted, it is only history, not a right wing conspiracy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis
“There Is Only The Fight . . .” Hilary’s paper supporting Alinsky’s Activism and Terrorism.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-saul-alinsky-letters-155526953.html?ref=gs
http://thefederalist.com/2014/09/22/media-in-2014-who-is-saul-alinsky-and-why-should-we-care/
Many people say that he dedicated Rules for Radicals to Lucifer, the Prince of Darkness. That is not technically true. Rather, he spoke fondly of him on the page preceding the Table of Contents. There he wrote, “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”
Now if you’re a moderately well-read person, you know who Saul Alinsky is. You know that he wrote the book — influential particularly for folks on the left — Rules for Radicals. And if you were born before a few years ago, you know that Clinton has always been a tad touchy regarding her ties to Alinsky.
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm
Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky: “True revolutionaries do not flaunt their radicalism, Alinsky taught. They cut their hair, put on suits and infiltrate the system from within. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties…. Many leftists view Hillary as a sell-out because she claims to hold moderate views on some issues. However, Hillary is simply following Alinsky’s counsel to do and say whatever it takes to gain power.
Notes on Saul Alinsky and Neo-Marxism:
Alinsky’s tactics were based, not on Stalin’s revolutionary violence, but on the Neo-Marxist strategies of Antonio Gramsci, an Italian Communist. Relying on gradualism, infiltration and the dialectic process rather than a bloody revolution, Gramsci’s transformational Marxism was so subtle that few even noticed the deliberate changes.
Like Alinsky, Mikhail Gorbachev followed Gramsci, not Lenin. In fact, Gramsci aroused Stalins’s wrath by suggesting that Lenin’s revolutionary plan wouldn’t work in the West. Instead the primary assault would be on Biblical absolutes and Christian values, which must be crushed as a social force before the new face of Communism could rise and flourish. Malachi Martin gave us a progress report:
“By 1985, the influence of traditional Christian philosophy in the West was weak and negligible…. Gramsci’s master strategy was now feasible. Humanly speaking, it was no longer too tall an order to strip large majorities of men and women in the West of those last vestiges that remained to them of Christianity’s transcendent God.”
“The end is what you want, the means is how you get it. Whenever we think about social change, the question of means and ends arises. The man of action views the issue of means and ends in pragmatic and strategic terms. He has no other problem; he thinks only of his actual resources and the possibilities of various choices of action. He asks of ends only whether they are achievable and worth the cost; of means, only whether they will work. … The real arena is corrupt and bloody.” p.24
“The first step in community organization is community disorganization. The disruption of the present organization is the first step toward community organization. Present arrangements must be disorganized if they are to be displace by new patterns…. All change means disorganization of the old and organization of the new.” p.116
Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals: “Known as the ‘father of modern American radicalism,’ Saul D. Alinsky (1909-1972) developed strategies and tactics that take the enormous, unfocused emotional energy of grassroots groups and transform it into effective anti-government and anti-corporate activism.
Just how evil are the EU, NATO, the United Nations, most of our Supreme Court in the United States, and most of our incumbent Senators and Represenetives in Washington, DC, and Hilary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Valerie Jarrett, the New Black Panthers, Louis Farakhan and his Nation of Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Hamas, ISIS, and Barack Obama and Merkel ?
As evil as anyone can be.
History tells us a different story.
You have to ignore all of history to call Islam a religion or to call socialism a good thing.
In the nations with Socialism, like in the nations with Islam, there is a horrilby rich ruling class, and 35 to 40 people of the nation live in complete poverty.
Nations with Socialism, like nations with Islam, are known for Human Rights Violations, Starvation, and for spreading war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsDSbgEZswY
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/07/10_more_reasons_wall_street_would_hate_bernie_sanders_partner/
http://reason.com/archives/2016/03/31/bernies-bad-ideas
In our Classrooms Socialism is a Great Thing, in real life it is one of the most evil and destructive things created by man, just like Islam.
Barack Obama’s, Merkel’s, and the United Nations’ Refugees are Terrorists.
The Allies did not do enough to destroy Islam and did not do enough to stop the Genocide of Christians by Muslims.
They did not destroy the Ottoman Empire, they just broke it up into evil Islamic Nations, with no respect for children, women, or human life.
World War 1 was the Last Crusade.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partitioning_of_the_Ottoman_Empire
History tells us a different story.
After the dead bodies are counted, it is only history, not a right wing conspiracy.
Ban the Islamic Cult ASAP!