With political corruption running high, how could there possibly be any hope in conducting a safe and secure voting system through online means? If the risk is so high alone, why would it even be suggested?
As Millenials seemed conjoined to any piece of technology, perhaps, this has led to the conclusion that the convenience of casting a presidential vote via online methods using computers, tablets, and smart phones would be preferred by voters.
The Wall Street Journal called the Republican’s Utah Open Caucus “one of the biggest online votes conducted so far in the U.S.” and the “largest experiment with online presidential voting since 2004, when Michigan allowed Democrats to vote in a party caucus via the Internet.”
Smartmatic Group is an election-equipment vendor selected to run the Utah GOP Caucus. Even as Antonio Mugica, founder and chief executive of Smartmatic Group addresses security concerns, he explains that their equipment is programmed with security protocols and backups of the election data if a recount came into order.
But none of this really matters, because so far, the chairman of Smartmatic’s board, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, currently serves on the board of George Soros’s Open Society Foundation; on the small board of another Soros-financed organization, the International Crisis Group , and shares a close relationship with the globalist outside of these organizations.
Read more on the next page about Obama’s 10-person Presidential Commission on Election Administration recommendation release for future online voting methods.
Bunch of damn crookd
Read and share Logic.. Not Emotional knee jerk stuff!
I am more convinced than ever.. that Donald Trump WILL actually win this thing. Not just the Republican nomination — the Presidency.
Its all coming together and the Establishment is petrified!
Trump has a perfectly plausible path to the presidency as a Republican. If he makes it to the White House, he’ll get there by taking the Upper Midwest back from the Democratic Party.
When President Barack Obama was re-elected in 2012, he ran up the score in the Electoral College, winning 25 states, good for 332 total electoral votes. His victory was thorough. He only needed 270 electoral votes to win, and President George W. Bush had taken just 286 in his 2004 re-election.
To secure the presidency, Democrats only have to win the Northeast, the West Coast, and the Upper Midwest, including Iowa.
Do you know that just four states: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin. … the four Rust Belt states account for 64 electoral votes. Even if Floridians, Iowans, Coloradans and all of the other swing states go to Hillary, failure to capture the Upper Midwest will be enough to hand the White House over to Trump.
Trump is not a loser like Shitt Romney. His chances of winning swing states like Florida, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico — are extremely high as the polls suggest! He might even win New York, Massachusetts and new Jersey.
But he doesn’t need them to win. All he has to do is carry the Rust Belt — a region perfectly attuned to Trump’s fiery denunciations of American trade policy and his angry condemnation of Washington corruption. While Loser Shitt Romney hailed free trade, globalization and “creative destruction,” Trump rails against the North American Free Trade Agreement and promises to bring jobs back home.
Who signed NAFTA into law? That would be former President Bill Clinton. Hillary Clinton can’t be held responsible for everything her husband did in office. But don’t think you won’t hear it on repeat this fall anyway.
Hillary Clinton’s inconsistency on trade has, thus far, only proven to be a liability for her among progressives. Republican leaders have broadly supported the trade policies that began under her husband — NAFTA, the creation of the World Trade Organization and the establishment of permanent normal trade relations with China. If Trump wins the GOP nomination, he will be the first Republican in decades to challenge a Democratic candidate on trade.
And he will. His constant tirades against China and Mexico will go into overdrive, and he will constantly attack Clinton’s back-and-forth record. Clinton currently opposes Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact with a host of Asian nations, but she helped negotiate it when she served as secretary of state, and top corporate lobbyists doubt the strength of her opposition.
Another fact to consider: The Rust Belt is disproportionately white. While there are pockets of color — in Philadelphia, Flint, Detroit, Milwaukee — the states are much whiter than the national average. America is 62 percent white, according to census data. Michigan, by contrast, is over 75 percent white, and Pennsylvania’s population is more than 77 percent white. More than 80 percent of Ohio is white, as is over 82 percent of Wisconsin.
Even people of color in the Upper Midwest feel personally targeted by the last 30 years of U.S. economic policy. Visit a Trump rally or check out the photos and videos of Trump gatherings, and you’ll get the idea. The Working folks are angry and disgusted by WASHINGTON DC AND THE ELITES.
Ok Rino Republicans pushed by the Party lost Ohio in the last two elections and haven’t won any of the other Upper Midwest states since the election of George H. W. Bush in 1988, and they haven’t taken Wisconsin since Ronald Reagan’s re-election. But in recent years, the GOP has nevertheless secured gubernatorial contests in all four states. The current governors of Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan are all Republicans, and Pennsylvania had a GOP governor until last year. So they say it won’t be easy for Trump to run that table, but it is doable.
Despite a crowded Republican field, Trump took more voters in New Hampshire than Clinton did in a two-way race. The combined Granite State turnout for Trump and fellow GOP hopefuls John Kasich, Ted Cruz, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Chris Christie was bigger than the collective vote total for Clinton and Sanders. Add in supporters of Republican candidates Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson and Rand Paul, and the numbers look even better for the GOP.
A study of voters from Cleveland and Pittsburgh conducted by Working America, an offshoot of the AFL-CIO labor federation, should compound those concerns. The union group surveyed working-class households making less than $75,000 a year, 90 percent of which had voted in the 2012 election. Although 53 percent of voters in the December-to-January survey had not decided on a general election candidate, Trump was crushing the competition among those who had. Trump’s 38 percent support was stronger than support for both Clinton and Sanders combined. And his backing wasn’t simply from hard-line conservatives. One in four Democrats who had settled on a candidate had decided on Trump.
SO WHEN THE ANTI TRUMP ELEMENTS IN THE REPUBLICAN PARTY AND THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AS A WHOLE SAY THAT TRUMP HAS NO CHANCE!!!
I say to them…. “YOU AIN’T SEEN NOTHING YET!
I believe that was illegal, can you imagine how many hackers were paid to vote?
Makes you question how votes were counted?
yeah, if it were not for voter fraud obama antichrist would not now be in office. Paper votes only, under the watchful eyes of the military. any illegal caught trying to vote should be shot down right at the polls, any one caught participating in fraud should be shot down immediately
Someone needs to get this man out of our lives.
It was corrupt
NO DAMM WONDER IT WAS CROOKED………………
Can anyone say “voter fraud”.
More than half of Republican voters believe the GOP is best off choosing Donald Trump as its 2016 presidential nominee if he arrives at the convention with the most delegates, according to a new poll.
In the latest Monmouth University national poll of Republican voters, 54 percent say their party should nominate the current GOP front-runner if he continues to lead the delegate count come July.