The American people have expressed their clear preference for preserving the 2nd Amendment and all citizens rights to own guns of all manner unless there are clear legal reasons to prevent that ownership, and to oppose rules and regulations that Democrats and President Obama want to impose to gradually confiscate weapons from the people. In fact, the number of senior citizens who have taken gun training classes has grown by 400 percent since 2010.
That is particularly curious because crime rates in general have declined during that same time. But as people watch the federal government seize powers not permitted in the Constitution, and watch radical groups such as demonstrating students run rampant through society without any response by law enforcement, many people feel that they must be able to defend themselves and not depend on the police. And of course the fear of Muslim terrorists who have vowed to destroy America, along with the non-response by the Obama administration, also leads to the need to be prepared and armed.
The Obama administration is not happy with the ability of citizens to arm themselves, or for the court rulings which confirm the populace has that right, and so the federal government is chipping away at the 2nd Amendment in smaller increments in order to strip different groups of their right for self-defense so as not a arouse the public at large. Most recently Obama has been working with the Social Security Administration to take away the guns belonging to individuals who have filed a claim of disability.
Social Security grabs guns of Social Security recipients, page 2:
RULES DONT COUNT, ONLY THE LAW COUNTS IN THIS ILLEGAL ACT!
this is bending the laws of the USA.
I am a huge second amendment supporter, but anyone who has a protective payee is way too far below normal emotional and or cognitive function to be safe with weapons.
It is not their roll to, has nothing to do with SS.
Total Bull$#%&!@*- obama just won’t give up on obvious promise to the muzzies – disarm Americans!
it recently came out that she defended a man who raped a 12 year old girl and blamed her for the rape.she traumitized the young girl , and helped the rapist get off with a two month sentence.so much for being concerned about women and girls.
They are trying to disarm the only ones who remember how great this country once was!
No! They have no jurisdiction!
A little something to think about and a post i am forwarding!”A lot of people have brought up the fact that they won’t vote for Trump if he’s the eventual nominee.
I just want to put something in perspective.
Justice Scalia’s seat is vacant. Ginsberg is 82 years old, Kennedy is 79, Breyer is 77, and Thomas is 67. Nowadays, the data shows that the average age of a Supreme Court retirement or death occurs after 75.
These are 5 vacancies that will likely come up over the next 4-8
years. The next President will have the power to potentially create a 7-2 Supreme Court skewed in their ideology.
Think about that… 7-2. If the next President appoints 5 young
justices, it will guarantee control of the Supreme Court for an entire generation. And 7-2 decisions will hold up much more over time than 5-4 decisions which are seemed to be lacking in mandate.
Hillary has made it clear she will use the Supreme Court to go after
the 2nd Amendment. She has literally said that the Supreme Court was wrong in its Heller decision stating that the Court should overturn and remove the individual right to keep and bear arms. Period.
Everyone saying that they won’t vote for one candidate or the other if they are the GOP nominee, please realize this. If Hillary Clinton wins and gets to make these appointments, you likely will never see another Conservative victory at the Supreme Court level for the rest of your life.
Ever.
Please vote, and please think about this when you do”.
What are they going to do search your home? Not.