A new Senate bill will start forcing citizens to report cash and other assets not held in banks. This bill is stated to combat terrorism and money laundering. But is it? It seems to most like just another government attempt to steal assets and raise revenue for social programs as this bill will give the government the authority to track assets and seize them should an individual fail to report independently held assets exceeding $10,000.
This brings to mind the FBI raid under former FBI Director Comey of a small Texan Conservative political gathering back in 2015. Agents confiscated electronics and forcibly fingerprinted all 60 people gathered at the meeting. Now let’s just suppose for a second that they found any evidence of unreported wealth during the raid. You better believe they’d have seized-up all the assets. This is a very real possibility unfolding before us right now since the Senate just passed this bill.
The government is even going to start throwing people in prison if they find out folks haven’t been reporting ALL of their assets. How long would you guess the minimum federal sentence would be for failing to report assets not held in a back? Here is a hint. It’s about double the average time handed for 1st-time rape offenders. Find out more about this freedom infringing bill and how it gives the government the right to start wiretapping private citizens on the next page.

Isn’t this illegal search and seizure?
Nice try.
There is no valid reason for this except invasion of privacy.
Who will do this? Haha. No way to enforce law.
In that case we, the abiding citizens wants to know just how much of our government and income tax money has been stolen and stashed in offshore bank accounts that’s now in the crooked loons in the DC and states lagoons names.
None.They’re special don’t you know.
U thieving idiots need to quit sucking off the population
This is absolutely against the constitution. Just one more way the pos can walk into your home without a warrant.
They know they are.
Ok, please reveal the names of the senators who voted NO on this. That shortens the list.