The United States Senate just passed a bill that mandates vaccinations of American veterans, and the amount they’ve required is ridiculous. Over the course of their prescribed immunization schedule, as many as 90 viruses could be injected into our nation’s unwilling veterans.
Vaccines have proven themselves dangerous in the past, creating untold and unforeseen health consequences. These have ranged from simple flu-like symptoms after injection, to serious matters such as spontaneous abortion. Vaccines can even be used as bio-terrorism.
Perhaps the most outrageous aspect of this new law is the fact that the men and women who have fought for the freedoms provided by the United States of America are now being stripped of the very rights they risked their lives to protect.
If our veterans aren’t exempt from the government takeover of our lives, who is?
To see the full report, read on to the next page:
UN Agenda 2030. Depopulation and new world order. Have to take away guns and make U.S. a third world country. Then the billionaires will have total control and power.
this nam vet stands for Trump…………… Trump is only unstoppable if we elect him with such huge numbers that the RNC can not deny him..Rubio is already talking about a brokered convention to try to keep his donors from cutting him off…I think we can all agree that the democrats are trying to take our country in the wrong direction and that obama especially has been a disaster..Most of us are also very disappointed in the republican fight or lack of a fight against this..There is no doubt that our representatives know what the people that elected them want. So why are they not doing our bidding for us?? It is very simple, they have sold out. They have been bought and paid for by special interests.It is a constant thing but it becomes a lot more evident during the presidental campaign season because we see the huge amount of money donated to the candidates and to their superpacs. Surely no one thinks that companies and individuals donate millions of dollars just because they are patriotic or out of the goodness of their heart..Hell no,they are buying influence. That is why our government is not working because the will of the people does not compare with the money to these politicians.. I think that most of us realize this but we have a tendancy to think it is all the others but not our representative. Ours of course is working for us. Well,that is just straight bull. They are all on the take. I think that all the incumbents should be voted out to send them a message . Then elect people that have actually worked for a living instead of lawyers and politicians that have never done anything except run their mouth and tell people what they want to hear in order to fill their own pockets. Think about it. The majority of politicians are lawyers and a very important part of a lawyers schooling is learning to lie convincingly to people. Jesus Christ people, we have got to change this. Please help me in booting all these liars out of office and replacing them with people that have business experience..The best first step we can take is to elect Trump for president..
Pretty sure this is a flat out lie and completely fictional.
Even though I’m a disabled Veteran, I refuse to go to the VA, I pay for privet medical insurance and go to my own doctor.
Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer’s life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self-defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
“Story affirmed the right of self-defense by persons held illegally. In his own writings, he had admitted that ‘a situation could arise in which the checks-and-balances principle ceased to work and the various branches of government concurred in a gross usurpation.’ There would be no usual remedy by changing the law or passing an amendment to the Constitution, should the oppressed party be a minority. Story concluded, ‘If there be any remedy at all … it is a remedy never provided for by human institutions.’ That was the ‘ultimate right of all human beings in extreme cases to resist oppression, and to apply force against ruinous injustice.’” (From Mutiny on the Amistadby Howard Jones, Oxford University Press, 1987, an account of the reading of the decision in the case by Justice Joseph Story of the Supreme Court.
As for grounds for arrest: “The carrying of arms in a quiet, peaceable, and orderly manner, concealed on or about the person, is not a breach of the peace. Nor does such an act of itself, lead to a breach of the peace.” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197)
Home » Liberty Library
Original URL: http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
Maintained: Jon Roland of the Constitution …((What happened to issues like “Don’t ask, don’t tell!”? (as $#%&!@* a vile sex crime punished by Death, renamed as “Gay” ) re U.C.M.J. Uniform Code of Military Justice, Art. 125$#%&!@*(& Beastiality) which still reads: “(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in un-natural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of$#%&!@* Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of$#%&!@*shall be punished as a court-martial offense. 50…10 U.S.C.A. Sec. 925, from 70A Statutes at Large 74, Aug. 10, 1956.” re fn.’s 51, 52 The Writings of George Washington, ed., by John C. Fitzpatrick (Washington D. C.: U. S. Gov’t. Printing Office, 1934), Vol. 2, p. 83-84. {fn56 Toby Marrotta, The Politics of Homosexuality, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Co., 1981, pg. 95, fn57 Ibid, p. 201. 58 Ibid. p. 6} citing Bowers v. Hardwick, supra. p. 197, Chief Justice Burger said: “To hold that the act homosexual$#%&!@*is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.” [quot. from Pub. by Weisman Publications, Copyright ©1993 Sodomites on Trial. 3rd. Edition 2004
Is this true? Fact r fiction
Gee I wonder why this is going on could be something on the way plus the fact that they have stock piled coffins at fema places
Been there, done that. Not sure which was worse, anthrax or small pox…
I was thinking the same thing. B
oops…I done me some investagathins……them dam republicans is really in charge of the lejaslaters they is trying to kill are vets so they can give trumps all the extra money…