This last week the Court of Appeals for the Second U.S. Circuit issued a long awaited decision on the constitutionality of the most drastic gun control law in U.S. history, the New York SAFE Act of 2013. This news is disturbing to 2nd Amendment advocates, and gun owners everywhere.
Those who oppose the government’s over reach into personal gun ownership see the writing on the wall. With the Court of Appeals up holding this legislation, the “Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement” (SAFE) which was introduced by New York state, the strict transfer laws, even between family members, seems to regulate gun ownership a bit too far right at the heart of the 2nd Amendment.
see how far your gun rights are threatened next page
Never give up your guns
They have to give up theirs first; body guards, security and personal guns!
America’s judiciary are smaller corporate branches called courts.
The judges are actually business administrators called judges and
all of America’s laws are civil corporate regulations called statutes.
People are treated as corporations in these courts and these socalled
bastions of justice are all about commerce and fraud!
Everyone needs to be on the same page and so precedents become
their safety benchmark!
The American B.A.R. Association is a foreign union and its members are all working in,collusion with Israel, the British Empire, the Vatican, the Rothschild and Rockefeller banking empires, Congress and the elite to undermine America. All attorneys are agents of a foreign power who swear allegiance to that foreign power i.e. the Queen of England.
This is why all lawyers must file a written ‘Notice of Appearance’ in
every court case they represent. By that notice, the lawyer is admitting to the court that he is a ‘foreign agent’ and he is requesting permission to represent you in that corporate court. Your contract with the lawyer gives him your sovereign ‘power of attorney’ to represent your best interests and he immediately uses it against you by admitting to the Judge that you will accept the jurisdiction and decisions of the corporate court! So much for winning your case or any appeal!
When a prosecutor loses a trial, he is obligated by the court to pay
the costs of prosecution, out of pocket! Your attorney always
divulges your defense strategy to the prosecutor to avert this
embarrassment and penalty from being assigned to him. This group
is a brotherhood and these corporate courts are a business and
everything is about commerce! People are regarded as nothing
more than corporate property!
The American B.A.R. Association is actually a branch of the National
Lawyers Guild Communist Party, which can only be located in the
hard copy printing of 28 USC 3002, section 15a. The on-line
version of Title 28 USC has been altered by the Attorney General to
read something entirely different, apparently because this fact has
recently shown up in too many private court petitions and
memorandums of law.
To become a member of the American B.A.R Association, applicants
must have obtained a Doctorate in Law or the equivalent thereof
and passed an examination designed to test the depth of their
indoctrination. If they pass, they are required to surrender their
American citizenship and swear allegiance to the Queen of England
and not the Constitution! This means that all card carrying American
lawyers are foreign agents, liars, traitors and communists!
No wonder Jesus warned us about, “lawyers!”
This is exactly why so many Judges are appointed,and not elected by the people. The President the national Military Commander in Chief, appoints the Federal Judges.The Governors,Military Commanders for the States appoint the State Judges. The Judges are appointed because civilians do not elect Military Officers. How is Military Law Enforcement on America? The Corporation “UNITED STATES” offers Corporation Citizenship and benefits, out into the American population burdening the unsuspecting recipients with Immigrant Status and excessive licensing and Taxation.
Attorneys : The Legal Profession has no more to do with ‘law’ than the Medical Profession has to do with ‘health’. So, when you hear nonsense such as, “practising law / medicine without a licence”, notice that the accused is usually practising ‘health’ or its counterpart in ‘law’ where a licence isn’t required. A licence is acquired only by those who choose to be under the jurisdiction of the entity issuing said licence. Those of us who choose to remain free make certain not to obtain any licences at all. A ‘licence to practise law” is procured by an attorney from the client who hires him and, until such time, does not have ‘a licence to practise law’. Yes, he has a bar card but this has nothing to do with a licence to take a case which must be obtained from the one who hires him. Consequently this is a great question to ask an attorney whom you don’t want involved in your commercial affairs. I like to tell them that I don’t give them permission to make a legal determination about me, because, until I do, they have no venue or jurisdiction. They are a stray looking for a home. They have nowhere near the power they like you to think they have. So, you want to be an ‘attorney’; here is your ‘job description’: – prosecute on behalf of IRS/CRA in order to imprison one for ‘failure to file’; – be appointed to (foisted upon) us by a ‘judge’ upon our being accused of a crime; – reject our filing of private documents into the public record – initiate and file all criminal complaints (we are prohibited) – confiscate property & funds from marital partners; dictate child custody during divorce proceedings – regulate private property via land use, planning laws, and codes – advise employers to confiscate funds via withholding tax from paycheques – approve the confiscation, by Child Protection Agents, of children from their families – begin foreclosure proceedings when too many mortgage payments are missed; – confiscate property when property taxes aren’t paid; – pilfer our estate via probate after our death; – turn into a ‘crime’ an activity which has been natural and lawful for centuries, yet, due to current legislation, now requires a licence; – initiate actions against us for committing a crime which, until recently, was a lawful activity; – reap hefty fees for exaggerating personal injury claims causing insurance premiums to sky-rocket; – claim to be able to handle personal disputes better than those involved; – complicate simple contracts between 2 parties to where they are completely incomprehensible; – file unnecessary, embellished paperwork for what would normally be considered simple claims; – depersonalize and complicate intimate processes such as adoption; – be the only one allowed into a jail cell even though a friend might better assist us; – play both sides of the ‘court’; – through the BAR police your own, be in charge of accreditation of Law Schools, determine the curriculum in Law Schools by granting or refusing accreditation, make and enforce laws designed to work only for you, make and enforce statutes which are impossible not to violate because there are over 60 million of them. – be the power behind all agencies which control the rest of us; – be a henchman and revenue collector for the IMF/ International Banksters; – become ‘power of attorney’ when we hire you (grant you a ‘licence to practise law’), thereby rendering ourselves ‘incompetent’; Once I told an attorney, with as straight a face as I could muster, that I truly believed that he was an honest fellow. He responded with, “Well, I try to be.” I said, “Well, if you were truly honest, you wouldn’t need to try to be.” (He was as crooked as a dog’s hind leg). My all-time favourite attorney-routine is the asking of two questions for the price of one. “Did you or did you not … ?” An attorney once asked me one of these double-edged questions and so I asked, “What is it you want to know?” He repeated the question so I answered, “Which question do you want answered?” He repeated it again, so I said, “no to the first question; yes to the second.” Not only didn’t he understand my answer, but also he didn’t understand his own question. If I had answered just “yes”, how could he know to which part I was referring? “Yes, I did not …”? or “Yes, I did … “? As idiotic as it is, attorneys still use this inane manner of questioning. They must think it sounds daunting, when in fact it only makes them sound as if they don’t know what they’re talking about, which in most cases is true. But this stunt also allows them to twist any answer to suit their case. Don’t fall for it. Always answer with either “I did” or “I did not” ……. in fact, skip the court altogether. There is nothing requiring you to go in the first place. Whom did the court ‘invite’? You? I don’t think so. All you have to do is RSVP. An invitation to court is tantamount to an invitation to a Charles Manson party. Don’t go; graciously decline.
There is 80 million of us and you only have a 1 million man standing Army that is overwhelmed! If the government becomes too radical like its saying in this post it becomes the citizens duty as our forefathers said to overthrow tyrannical Government. We never gave 6 non elected judges permission to take any of our rights. If they take the 2nd amendment then they take them all. The Second Amendment protects them all it’s worth dying to protect. With the right to bear arms we are citizens without that right we are subjects.
Today,the courts we have are not courts of law; they are courts of Commercial Contract. The Uniform Commercial Code is the ”law”that the court is applying today in order to”gain” jurisdiction of all citizens, regardless of their status.The Uniform Commercial Code is based on bankruptcy. The only reason that an individual is even allowed to talk about the Constitution in court is because the judges want to keep up a ”smoke screen” to keep us in the dark regarding what is REALLY happening in court.Because our public servants, who are employed by the federal government have gone beyond the bounds of their authority,it became necessary to put this”smoke screen” to mislead us into believing we have Constitutional Rights. When you demand your Constitutional Rights in courts,the judge will tell you that”…you will get all of the Rights you deserve”, and then he will go on to say that”the Right you are demanding is NOT one of those Rights”,but he/she won’t tell you what Rights YOU DESERVE.The ”Rights”he is referring to are the ”Rights” of the business world (the Uniform Commercial Code); and,they are not Constitutional at all.
There are no Judicial Courts in America and there have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes.( FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178.
There have not been any Judges in America Since 1789. There have just been Administrators ( FRC v.GE 281 US 464, Keller v.PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178).